Cases 21 - 30 of 189
ORTEGA-VIGO v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2008cv05857
Petitioner:
YOLANDA ORTEGA-VIGO
Respondent:
RACHEL MARTINEZ, MICHAEL MUKASEY and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PLUBPLUNG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05699
Petitioner:
TIRAYUTN PLUBPLUNG
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KHAWAJA v. AVILA et al
as 2:2008cv05664
Petitioner:
ZAHIDULLAH KHAWAJA
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILA, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and MICHAEL MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BOUMGHAREF v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv05302
Petitioner:
AHMED BOUMGHAREF
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBBER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
SALEH v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2008cv04441
Petitioner:
HASSAN AHMED SALEH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SANTOS-RUIZ et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 3:2008cv04352
Petitioner:
GIOBANNI SANTOS-RUIZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS and EDMOND CICCHI
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAVIS v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv04266
Petitioner:
DAVID ORLANDO DAVIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ALCANTARA v. CHERTOFF
as 1:2008cv04302
Petitioner:
BERNARDO ANTONIO ALCANTARA
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
