Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Boyce v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv00580
Petitioner:
Hillary Randolph Boyce
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Thomas Decker, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Welsh v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00541
Petitioner:
Winston Welsh
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Julie L. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cheku v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv00527
Petitioner:
Babu Cheku
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Julie L. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MAMMADOVA et al v. DECKER et al
as 3:2008cv00501
Petitioner:
Esmira Mammadova and Tengiz Mammadov
Respondent:
Thomas R. Decker, Thomas R. Decker, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ogiata v. Donate et al
as 3:2008cv00416
Petitioner:
Emmanuel O. Ogiata
Respondent:
Janine Donate, Thomas Decker, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Akinsehinwa v. Donate et al
as 1:2008cv00395
Petitioner:
Christopher Akinsehinwa
Respondent:
Janine Donate, Thomas Decker and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Conte v. Donate et al
as 1:2008cv00326
Petitioner:
Baba Conte
Respondent:
Janine Donate, Thomas Decker, USICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
