Cases 21 - 30 of 31
ROGERS v. NJDOC et al
as 1:2015cv07005
Plaintiff:
MARTIN LUTHER ROGERS
Defendant:
NJDOC, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL & CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, ROBERT BUECHELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBSTER et al v. N.J. PAROLE
as 3:2014cv06739
Plaintiff:
JAMES WEBSTER, ANTHONY PEARSON, TYREEN WALKER and others
Defendant:
N.J. PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2013cv05372
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ORTIZ
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. MILLS et al
as 2:2013cv03094
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD
Defendant:
MILLS , BROWN , UMDNJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2012cv01637
Petitioner:
KEITH DAVID MILLS
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GARY M. LANIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLS v. SALEM COUNTY COURT SYSTEM
as 1:2011cv03384
Petitioner:
RALPH MILLS
Respondent:
SALEM COUNTY COURT SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLS v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2010cv04976
Petitioner:
EUGENE MILLS
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COOK v. RAJIV K. SHAH, MD et al
as 1:2009cv06523
Plaintiff:
STANLEY COOK
Defendant:
RAJIV K. SHAH, MD, DR. LISA RENEE MILLS, MD, DR. JANE DOE, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. MEE et al
as 2:2009cv05987
Petitioner:
THOMAS W. MILLS
Respondent:
DONALD MEE and ANNE M. MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMMARY v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2009cv01989
Plaintiff:
DARRYL ANTHONY HAMMARY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE (CMS), UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY, (UMD) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
