Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Muhammad v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv01436
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Olugbenga Ogunsanwo and E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Marion County
as 5:2016cv00663
Plaintiff:
Abdullah A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Marion County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv24483
Plaintiff:
Hafiz Muhammad Sher Ali Khan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Muhammad v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
Eric R Williams, Rosevelt Green, Jr, Zonnie Guess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad El Bey Tey Washitaw v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2016cv20646
Plaintiff:
Drelijah J. Muhammad El Bey Tey Washitaw
Defendant:
State of Alabama, State of Florida, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. JONES et al
as 4:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES , ALEX TAYLOR , MARVIN DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Sapp et al
as 2:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
George Sapp, James Upchurch and James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv20228
Plaintiff:
Sameer Muhammad
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hlergwa et al v. Glades County Detention Center et al
as 1:2014cv22964
Plaintiff:
Treasure Hlergwa, Juan C. Meza, Julio Cesar Perez and others
Defendant:
Glades County Detention Center , Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Telmate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MUHAMMAD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , JAMES R UPCHURCH , ALEX TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
