Cases 21 - 30 of 35
ABUHOURAN v. NICKLIN et al
as 1:2011cv04797
Plaintiff:
HITHAM ABUHOURAN
Defendant:
Nicklin, Art Roberts, Marc A. Renda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSENSTEIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv00328
Petitioner:
NEIL ROSENSTEIN
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBERTS et al v. AVILES et al
as 2:2010cv05916
Plaintiff:
NEIL ROBERTS, ANDRE CHRISTIE, JOSE N. ESPINAL and others
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, RIVERA, DAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSENSTEIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv03710
Petitioner:
NEIL ROSENSTEIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARRISON v. ATLANTIC (REGION) OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER et al
as 1:2010cv02294
Plaintiff:
NEIL HARRISON
Defendant:
ATLANTIC (REGION) OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROBERT MORAN and NELLY MARQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STIERHOFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv00151
Plaintiff:
NEIL STIERHOFF
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STIERHOFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv06187
Petitioner:
NEIL STIERHOFF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCOTT v. GALINSKI et al
as 2:2009cv02694
Plaintiff:
RANDY SCOTT
Defendant:
EDMUND GALINSKI, JOHN PASSASELLA, ELMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONKLIN v. PARRISH et al
as 1:2008cv02907
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CONKLIN
Defendant:
R. DAVID PARRISH, E. DAVIS, NEIL LAYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SIMMS v. DR. NEIL et al
as 1:2008cv01346
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN SIMMS
Defendant:
DR. NEIL, DR. NUGENT, DR. JOANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
