Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Alexander v. Whetsel et al
as 5:2015cv00484
Plaintiff:
Nathan Dean Alexander
Defendant:
John Whetsel, Byron Collins, Oklahoma County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harding v. Causase et al
as 5:2015cv00316
Plaintiff:
William L Harding
Defendant:
Robert Causase, Christian Awusu, Oklahoma County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Oklahoma County Detention Center
as 5:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Michael James Rodriguez
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Whetsel et al
as 5:2010cv01327
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bon Stout
Defendant:
John Whetsel and Oklahoma County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Smith, et al
as 09-6122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
FERN SMITH, WES LANE, District Attorney, OKLAHOMA COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and others
Johnson v. Oklahoma City, City of et al
as 5:2008cv01392
Plaintiff:
Deandre Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Oklahoma City, City of, John Doe, Oklahoma County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Oklahoma County Detention Center et al
as 5:2008cv00690
Plaintiff:
Tori Quintrell Hill
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Detention Center, Oklahoma County Jail, Ryan Icer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Myers v. Bird et al
as 5:2008cv00636
Plaintiff:
Krystopher Antonio Myers
Defendant:
Timothy Bird, Officer Hultman, John Whetsel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thornton v. Hill et al
as 5:2008cv00575
Plaintiff:
Scott M Thornton
Defendant:
Larry Hill, Major Carson, Lt Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clay v. Smith et al
as 5:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Clay
Defendant:
Fern Smith, Wes Lane and Oklahoma County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
