Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Martin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv00112
Petitioner:
Otis Martin
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2015cv00470
Petitioner:
Otis W. Wright
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mack v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv00676
Petitioner:
Otis Mack, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blaxton v. Hillsborough County, Florida et al
as 8:2014cv02602
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Defendant:
Hillsborough County, Florida, State of Florida, Chet Tharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otis Blaxton v. Office of the Attorney General
as 8:2014cv01832
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towbridge v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2014cv21535
Plaintiff:
Otis L. Towbridge
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Towbridge v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2014cv21126
Plaintiff:
Otis L. Towbridge
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. United States of America
as 8:2013cv02317
Plaintiff:
Otis Fred Martin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blaxton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00756
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Kenneth J. Plante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaxton v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2013cv00634
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton and Pro Earth
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
