Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Abdoulaye v. United States et al
as 1:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Sako Abdoulaye
Defendant:
Dr. Troy Brodwish, Officer Joseph Cimaglia, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. New York City et al
as 1:2017cv00423
Defendant:
P.O. Jackson, P.O. John Doe 1, P.O. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Ohern et al
as 2:2016cv07177
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe, P.O. John Doe, P.O. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04463
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officers Jane Doe 1-2, Undercover P.O. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez v. Fredericks et al
as 1:2015cv09528
Plaintiff:
Kim Vasquez
Defendant:
P.O. John Fredericks, P.O. John Does, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyde v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03640
Plaintiff:
John Hyde
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe #1, EMS John Doe #2, P.O. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jeffers v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05395
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. John Doe and Sgt. Bin Safir
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jeffers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morston v. Cabral et al
as 1:2014cv05079
Defendant:
P.O. Ramon E. Cabral, P.O. John Doe 1 and P.O. John Doe 2
Plaintiff:
Barry Morston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. John Doe et al
as 1:2014cv05052
Defendant:
Sgt. John Doe, P.O. John Doe 1 and P.O. John Doe 2
Plaintiff:
Dawood Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alamo v. P.O. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2014cv02486
Plaintiff:
Edwin Alamo
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe 1, P.O. Jane Doe 2, Supervising Officer John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
