Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Honeycutt v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00237
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Honeycutt
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farmer v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00224
Petitioner:
Rodney E Farmer
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farmer v. Pearson et al
as 6:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
Rodney E Farmer
Defendant:
Charles Pearson, Alicia Littlefield and Tulsa County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00196
Petitioner:
Rick Lee Buchanan
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00115
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Nigel Howard
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mead v. Pearson
as 6:2013cv00086
Petitioner:
Rodney Glen Mead
Respondent:
Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Oliver v. Hayes et al
as 6:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Oliver, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew Hayes, Robin Adair, Mike Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Muskogee County Detention Center et al
as 6:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Terran L. Sanders
Defendant:
Muskogee County Detention Center, R.E. Charles Pearson , Raymond Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. Muskogee County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2009cv00226
Plaintiff:
James Brian Wright
Defendant:
Muskogee County, Oklahoma, Charles Pearson, Stan Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Pearson et al
as 6:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Taylor
Defendant:
Charles Pearson, Michael Gray, James Girty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
