Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Mike et al v. Lafavers et al
as 7:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Bryan L Mike, Brandon Blacknall, R James Johnson and others
Defendant:
J W Lafavers, M Moberley and R Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdo v. Barnett et al
as 1:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Birdo
Defendant:
B Barnett, Adam R Gonzales, Christine N Dewbre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Baker et al
as 3:2015cv03544
Plaintiff:
Allen Glenn Thomas
Defendant:
Robert E. Baker, Ronald C. Fox, Adam R. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Livingston et al
as 1:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Atiba Ramone Taylor
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Teresa A. Comacho, Ronald C Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
Robbie W. McDaniel
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Eddy Wheeler, Leotis J. Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole et al v. Chang et al
as 2:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Devin Paul Cole and Olufolake Ogunlade
Defendant:
Philemon D. Chang, MD, Ms. Ellerbee, Ms. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff v. McCullough et al
as 2:2012cv00254
Plaintiff:
Chester Lowe Huff
Defendant:
Tamara McCullough, Louis R. Herklotz, Eva Villarreal and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Perez et al
as 2:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
Carlos Luran Harris
Defendant:
Cesario S. Perez, Rosa Mitchell, Jim Kaelin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Reyes et al
as 4:2008cv02308
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Gonzales
Defendant:
Jose Reyes, Tommy Thomas and Moore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kammar v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv00322
Petitioner:
Joma Kammar
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
