Cases 21 - 30 of 164
Marlo McGee v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2021cv01821
Plaintiff:
Marlo McGee
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Chad Bianco, Rosa Whiting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Marti v. Manning et al
as 2:2021cv01829
Plaintiff:
Alex Lamota Marti
Defendant:
Todd Manning, D. Pasioles, J. Canela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hudkins v. Clark, et al.
as 1:2021cv01473
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Hudkins and William H. Brandstatt
Defendant:
K Clark, T. Campbell, C. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Moreno v. L. Vaca et al
as 2:2021cv07298
Plaintiff:
Tony Moreno
Defendant:
L. Vaca, F. Villalobos, D. Shumacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 5:2021cv06512
Plaintiff:
Alphonso R. Clark
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital, Romono, Edward Kookhyung Chough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keiron M. Elias v. Rosas et al
as 2:2021cv06052
Plaintiff:
Keiron M. Elias
Defendant:
Rosas, Lt. Martinez and RC Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harker-Lozada v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 5:2021cv02921
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa Police Department, Matthew Meloche, R J Navarro and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Harker-Lozada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Atencio v. Allison et al
as 1:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, P. Villegas and Rosa Avila
Plaintiff:
Aaron William Atencio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Williams-Mootry v. Benbrook et al
as 2:2021cv00229
Defendant:
P - Barker, S. Lickiss, C. Elston and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Mo'nique Williams-Mootry, Lonnie Clark Williams and Lonnie Mo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lozada v. Santa Rosa 800 Plaza Macy's Dept Store et al
as 5:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Santa Rosa 800 Plaza Macy's Dept Store and Matt Raaberg
Plaintiff:
Victor M Lozada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
