Cases 21 - 30 of 129
Hickman v. The Legal Aid Society et al
as 1:2019cv05294
Plaintiff:
Quandell Hickman
Defendant:
The Legal Aid Society and Brittney Rose Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Prieur et al
as 9:2019cv00639
Consolidated Defendant:
Jane Doe, Doe Morin, Doe Scarlotta and others
Defendant:
D. Venettozzi, John Doe, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. LaManna
as 1:2019cv00617
Petitioner:
Rose Chase
Respondent:
Superintendent LaManna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rose v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv03974
Petitioner:
Floyd Rose
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clemente v. John Doe et al
as 1:2018cv05968
Defendant:
Michael J. Schwed, Correction Officer Richard Brown, Charles Schulman and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Clemente
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemente v. John Doe et al
as 1:2018cv09464
Defendant:
Michael J. Schwed, Richard Brown, Charles Schulman and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Clemente
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Warden of the Rose M. Singer Center
as 1:2018cv04782
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth J. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden of the Rose M. Singer Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden of the Rose M. Singer Center
as 1:2018cv07422
Petitioner:
Elizabeth J. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden of the Rose M. Singer Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rose v. Brever et al
as 2:2018cv00379
Defendant:
Christopher Brever, Robert Stueber, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Winston Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. DuPree et al
as 9:2017cv01240
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Rose
Defendant:
S. DuPree, S. LeClair, S. Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
