Cases 21 - 30 of 223
Harrison v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Harrison
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Anthony Wills, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Toney et al
as 1:2023cv01765
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Russell
Defendant:
Ofc. Toney, Ofc. Bastryx and Supt. Rocco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, Russell Owens, . Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Turner et al
as 1:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Commisa Turner, Brad Johnson, . Peirson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Douglas W Mayberry
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Russell Austin, . Rene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Hart et al
as 1:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
. Hart, . Pierson, Russell Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Hart et al
as 1:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
. Hart, Russell Owens, . Edelmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Owens et al
as 1:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Russell Owens, . Anderson, . Hughs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Crawford et al
as 3:2023cv03007
Plaintiff:
Charles Graham
Defendant:
Deontay Crawford, George Milanez, . Sandu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv00006
Petitioner:
LaShawn Russell
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
