Cases 21 - 30 of 160
Boyd v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00777
Petitioner:
Scott Garrnett Boyd
Respondent:
Patrick Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. Graham et al
as 3:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Wilson
Defendant:
Charles Scott Graham, M.D., Ashley Clements, Kelly Drollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Ross
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Kate Brown, Tina Kotek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Flores
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Collette Peters, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv00405
Petitioner:
Ronnie Scott Smith
Respondent:
E. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv01905
Plaintiff:
James Scott Johnson
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Josh Highberger, Marica G. Ventura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv01510
Petitioner:
Patrick Scott Cartwright
Respondent:
Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. U.S. Marshals
as 3:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Keonte Desmont Scott
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steffler v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 2:2021cv01875
Petitioner:
Scott Brian Steffler
Respondent:
Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graue v. Miller
as 2:2021cv01635
Petitioner:
Scott Vincent Graue
Respondent:
Jaime Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
