Cases 21 - 30 of 74
DeBlasio v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Plaintiff:
Philip E. DeBlasio
Defendant:
Correctional Officer John Doe #2, Correctional Officer Simon, Correctional Officer John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. City of New York Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv12063
Plaintiff:
Milton Simon
Defendant:
City of New York Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luckey v. Jonas et al
as 1:2018cv08291
Defendant:
C.O. Lischkin, Captain Jonas, C.O. Simpson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Luckey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luckey v. Jonas et al
as 1:2018cv08103
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Joseph, Captain Jonas, Correctional Officer Simon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Luckey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dallas vs. Vosburgh, et al
as 1:2018cv00336
Plaintiff:
James Dallas
Defendant:
Simon Vosburgh, Patrick Gallaway, Robert Reinard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. NYS Child Support Agency, et al
as 2:2018cv01101
Respondent:
Jane Doe's, Sean Banner, All Adverse Parties and others
Petitioner:
Mark Ronald Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dawkins v. Copeland et al
as 1:2017cv09926
Plaintiff:
Edward Dawkins
Defendant:
Copeland, M. Holiness, Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. Palos et al
as 2:2017cv06159
Respondent:
Jane Doe's, Nicholas Jordan Palos, All Adverse Parties and others
Petitioner:
Mark Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pintel v. 71st Precinct NYPD
as 1:2017cv03862
Defendant:
71st Precinct NYPD
Plaintiff:
Itzhak Simon Pintel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ifill et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04548
Plaintiff:
Richard Sunday Ifill, Daniel Rice, Ralph Wilson and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, DeBlasio, The Commissioner Environmental Health Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
