Cases 21 - 30 of 11,527
Wood v. State of Florida
as 8:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Charity Noelle Wood
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steelman v. Steelman et al
as 6:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Christopher Steelman
Defendant:
James Steelman, Tresa Steelman, Colombo Mummers P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz, Pavel M. v. State of Florida
as 4:2024cv10042
Plaintiff:
Pavel Martinez Ruiz
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCUMSEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER D MCCUMSEY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lockhart, Roderick v. State of Florida
as 0:2024cv60732
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Lockhart
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Codner v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 0:2024cv60726
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Codner
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, Governor Ron DeSantis, Attorney General Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. State of Florida
as 9:2024cv80554
Plaintiff:
Johnny Thomas
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
CARLOS S KENON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
