Cases 21 - 30 of 189
(PC) Shannon v. Rojas et al
as 2:2022cv01556
Plaintiff:
M. T. Shannon
Defendant:
C. Rojas and J. Garry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Shannon v. Moseley
as 2:2022cv01530
Plaintiff:
M. T. Shannon
Defendant:
Howard Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Shannon v. Tapiz et al
as 2:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyrone Shannon
Defendant:
J Tapiz, J. Garry and A.W.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Butler v. Kelso et al
as 2:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
Darius Butler
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Richard Kirkland, Lisa Heintz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Willie Farfan v. Shannon Dicus et al
as 5:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Willie Farfan
Defendant:
Shannon Dicus, Board of Supervisors, Does 1 thru 10 Board of Supervisors, individual and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Shannon v. Gudino et al
as 2:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Seth Peter Shannon
Defendant:
H. Gudino, San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office and San Joaquin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Shannon v. Bachand et al
as 2:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Seth Peter Shannon
Defendant:
Victor Bachand, Gregory Dupriest and Allison Barsetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Quinto et al
as 2:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Alan Quinto, Bobby Gilbert, Shannon Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Quinto et al
as 1:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Alan Quinto, Bobby Gilbert, Shannon Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Farfan v. Shannon Dicus et al
as 5:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Willie Farfan
Defendant:
Shannon Dicus, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
