Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Birthmark v. Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Birthmark
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birthmark v. Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Birthmark
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Big International Criminal Organization et al
as 9:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Ivan T. Mendez
Defendant:
Big International Criminal Organization and Wired Soldiers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damon v. Sandefur et al
as 4:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Shawn T. Damon
Defendant:
Dirk M Sandefur, John Parker, Neal P Dubois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damon v. McDermott et al
as 4:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Shawn T. Damon
Defendant:
Bruce McDermott, John Parker, Steve Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adrian Francis Perez
Defendant:
T. Green, Mike Ferriter, Patrick Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birthmark
as 4:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Birthmark
Defendant:
Defendants unknown at this time
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DaSilva v. Green et al
as 6:2011cv00027
Petitioner:
Robert A DaSilva, Jr.
Respondent:
T. Green and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nesdale v. Mahoney
as 9:2011cv00033
Petitioner:
Timothy T. Nesdale
Respondent:
Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. Mahoney et al
as 2:2009cv00065
Petitioner:
Kevin T. Murphy
Respondent:
Mike Mahoney and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
