Cases 21 - 30 of 36
BRADLEY v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2012cv05236
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRADLEY
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. R. KILROY, J. PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCKLEY v. NEW PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2012cv05449
Plaintiff:
TOM BUCKLEY
Defendant:
NEW PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPT., COURT CLERK UNION COUNTY CT, DONHOUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCKLEY v. DONUHUE et al
as 2:2012cv02138
Plaintiff:
TOM BUCKLEY
Defendant:
J. DONUHUE, GOLDBERG, CARROL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SINGLETARY v. BURLINGTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NATHAN SINGLETARY, III
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COUNTY JAIL, WARDEN COX, CAPT. LARKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKLEY v. FELDMAN et al
as 1:2010cv06181
Plaintiff:
TOM BUCKLEY
Defendant:
MIKE FELDMAN, MIKE KOWALSKI and ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. HALL et al
as 1:2010cv01022
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CLARK
Defendant:
HOPE HALL, TOM CLANCY, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCKLEY v. KOWALSKI
as 1:2009cv05460
Plaintiff:
TOM BUCKLEY
Defendant:
ATLANTIC CITY JAIL MAYS LANDING, MIKE KOWLISKI and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
