Cases 21 - 30 of 34
MORROW v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2016cv00608
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KEITH MORROW
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00492
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2015cv02139
Plaintiff:
MILES ORLANDO LEE
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, LORETTA LYNCH, STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2015cv01388
Petitioner:
CLARENCE BAKER
Respondent:
CHARLIE PETERSON and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KINGSTON v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
ROALSTON STEVENSON KINGSTON
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEH CHARLES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv00808
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. FORD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. ATTORNEYS OFFICE N.D. ILLINOIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WASHINGTON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv01850
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, ISSAC JOHNSTON and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2011cv01742
Petitioner:
LARNELL WAYNE YOUNG
Respondent:
SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv00633
Petitioner:
JAMES DALTON BELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
