Cases 21 - 30 of 3,264
Anderson v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2024cv50296
Defendant:
Unknown Officer, Swartz, Lt. Walden and others
Plaintiff:
Quaylan K'won Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jalees v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv05186
Defendant:
Mohammed Jalees
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Jose Catalan-Avila.
as 1:2024cv04825
Defendant:
Jose Catalan-Avila
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv04801
Defendant:
Steffan Lewis
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Rossini
as 1:2024cv04798
Defendant:
Albert Rossini
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Bowden v. United States
as 1:2024cv04528
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bowden
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States of America v. Clay
as 1:2024cv04217
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carleous Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Gary
as 1:2024cv03818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
King v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03704
Petitioner:
Andre King
Respondent:
of America United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jeude v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
USA, United States Marshalls Service, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
