Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.) et al
as 1:2015cv02101
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.), United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2013cv01000
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Theodore Jackson, Fulton County Pretrial Service, Overton Thierry and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00010
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rivera-Lebron v. Haynes et al
as 2:2011cv00073
Petitioner:
Esteban Rivera-Lebron
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes , Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schenher v. Haynes et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Petitioner:
William L. Schenher, Jr.
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roberts v. United States Federal Courts et al
as 5:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jessie Joenathan Roberts
Defendant:
United States Federal Courts, United States Attorney, DEA Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hickey et al
as 2:2009cv00017
Petitioner:
Robert H. Martin
Respondent:
Debra Hickey, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
