Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
DeVore v. Balmer et al
as 3:2013cv00915
Defendant: Ann Aiken, Victor G. Atiyeh, Thomas A. Balmer and others
Plaintiff: Robert Allen DeVore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Dehne et al
as 2:2013cv00432
Defendant: Ms. Debbie Brown, Ms. Terry Dehne and Mr. Dennis Walton
Plaintiff: Jerome Victor Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Nooth
as 2:2012cv00871
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Petitioner: Victor Akeem White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nava v. Thomas
as 3:2009cv01150
Plaintiff: Victor R. Nava, Jr.
Defendant: J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thibodeaux v. Williams et al
as 1:2009cv06186
Plaintiff: Louis James Thibodeaux
Defendant: Max Williams, Stan Czernaik, SAIF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00014
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00014
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schildan v. Hall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00406
Petitioner: Victor Nathan Schildan
Respondent: Guy Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavez v. Belleque We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00287
Petitioner: Victor Hugh Tumbaco Chavez
Respondent: Brian Belleque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01270
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?