Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Grady, Sr. v. Bennett et al
as 3:2016cv01270
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Grady, Sr.
Defendant:
Nathon Bennett, Shawn Whitecotton, M. Winn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2016cv01209
Plaintiff:
Lionel R Beard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, J. S. Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoskins v. Attig et al
as 1:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Defendant:
Jim B Attig, Patricia L West, Aberardo A Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bentz v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, Chief Administrator of Pontiac Correctional Center, JAMES S. BLACKARD, Major at Pontiac Correctional Center, SUSAN PRENTICE, Lieutenant and others
Smith v. Pfister et al
as 1:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
Romelle Smith
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Helen Hamilton, P L West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Pfister et al
as 1:2015cv01062
Plaintiff:
Donte Patterson
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Helen Hamilton, P L West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minter v. Pfister et al
as 1:2015cv01019
Plaintiff:
Marlon . Minter, Sr.
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Helen Hamilton, Glendal French and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Gossett et al
as 1:2014cv01440
Plaintiff:
Paul Chatman
Defendant:
Greg Gossett, Whitecotton, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Gish et al
as 1:2012cv01436
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Donald Gish, Vickie Kendrick, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Germaine Elcock v. Lance Whitecotton, et al
as 10-3702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERMAINE A. ELCOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCE WHITECOTTON, LINCOLN ROTH, MARY SIGLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
