Cases 21 - 30 of 301
BIZZELL v. KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS et al
as 3:2023cv21050
Plaintiff:
JESSIE LEE BIZZELL
Defendant:
KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS, MR PERRY, B DYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Baker et al
as 2:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Harris, Sr.
Defendant:
Shelly Baker, Lori Norwood, Division of Risk Management, Department of Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MAURICE SMITH
Defendant:
D PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYSON v. SHIVER
as 3:2023cv14417
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRYSON
Defendant:
J SHIVER, DONALD LEAVINS, J D PITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNGBLOOD v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2023cv12143
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, DEBRA PERRY, J S EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. DYAS et al
as 5:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
SEDRICK WASHINGTON
Defendant:
COLE DYAS, EARL B KNOBLES, JR, RICKY MAZINGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv06730
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, DONALD LEAVINS, JAMES PITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Oritz et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mack
Defendant:
FNU Oritz, FNU Bowers, U.D.C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JOYNER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
CARLTON GENE JOYNER
Defendant:
DIXON, W SUMMERS, L CHILDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Miller et al
as 3:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
I. G. Miller, Lt. Aiken, Sgt. J. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
