Cases 21 - 30 of 6,914
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KEERIKKATTIL v. PETERS et al
as 1:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
RANJITH KEERIKKATTIL
Respondent:
COLLETE S. PETERS and WARDEN VICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOPEZ v. USA
as 1:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
DIEGO RIGOBERTO LOPEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITCHARD v. SURAMPUDI et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WITCHARD
Defendant:
VIJAYA S. SURAMPUDI, MATTHEW H. SOLOMSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. JAMISON
as 1:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
J. JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOTEN v. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al.
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE C. MOTEN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RANDY GRIFFIN, COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
GEZO GOEONG EDWARDS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HILL v. JAMISON
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
J. JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
