Cases 31 - 40 of 819
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jordan v. YesCare et al
as 6:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Theopholus H. Jordan and Theopholus Jordan
Defendant:
YesCare, K. Whiting, C. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. UNKNOWN
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
NELSON MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MILLER, SGT ANDERSON, UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morra v. Worrell et al
as 6:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
William J. Morra, Jr.
Defendant:
Monique H. Worrell, Alison Lopes, Jennifer Lynn Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Bermudez et al
as 6:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
Theopholus H. Jordan
Defendant:
Harry Bermudez, Ryan Mason and Unknown Shift Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Corizon Medical et al
as 6:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Theopholus H. Jordan
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, K. Whiting, C. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER et al
as 3:2023cv04798
Plaintiff:
LEONTE D WRIGHT, SR
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER and BONNIE H STAPLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. COOK et al
as 3:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
G COOK, JOSHUA D HATTAWAY, RANDELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Lopez
as 3:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Lowe
Defendant:
H. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
