Cases 31 - 40 of 267
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLACKFORD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv17769
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SLACKFORD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DR. LIMBERKAR, DR. S. MCGANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. MENDOZA et al
as 3:2021cv17399
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, OMAR MENDOZA, OFFICER YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. WHITE
as 1:2021cv16636
Plaintiff:
JEREMY RANDOLPH MARTIN
Defendant:
D. K. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2021cv13353
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, SHIRLEY K. TURNER, VERLINA REYNOLDS-JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYER et al v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 2:2021cv12393
Plaintiff:
DENNIS TARBY, MANUEL DIAZ, GLENN JONES and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KORECKY et al v. COUNTY OF OCEAN et al
as 3:2021cv12606
Plaintiff:
ANOTHONY R. KORECKY, TONY O. GONZALEZ and ANTHONY R. KORECKY
Defendant:
NINA L. CHAELTON-HAGEN, MR. TERIZZI, DORIS D'ANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. MCKEVITT et al
as 3:2021cv10364
Defendant:
K. MCKEVITT and K. PESCE
Plaintiff:
JASON SANDERS and JASON T. SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. CORECIVIC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv11362
Defendant:
CORECIVIC, INC., ERIKA GONZALEZ, SANDRA TUTLER and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
