Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Jimenez v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv22811
Plaintiff:
Randolph Carrillo Jimenez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Pozdol v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv22640
Plaintiff:
Randolph Jerome Pozdol
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Randolph v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00994
Petitioner:
Darnell Randolph
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00710
Petitioner:
Darnell Randolph
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLINN v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH C FLINN
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL and ESCAMBIA COUNTY MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Oneal
as 3:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
William James Randolph
Defendant:
FNU Oneal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Luce
as 8:2012cv02479
Plaintiff:
William James Randolph
Defendant:
Richard A. Luce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockard v. Broward County Court System et al
as 0:2012cv60477
Plaintiff:
William Randolph Lockard
Defendant:
Broward County Court System, Broward County Public Defenders Office, Broward County Jail System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chi v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv00388
Petitioner:
Randolph Chi
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lockard v. Dizer et al
as 0:2012cv60148
Plaintiff:
William Randolph Lockard
Defendant:
Dizer and Barbara Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
