Cases 31 - 40 of 59
ROUDABUSH v. MILANO et al
as 1:2013cv01474
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
MILANO, M. JOSIAH, F. MENSAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. C.M. HYLTON, USDC-EDVA et al
as 1:2013cv01173
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
C.M. HYLTON, USDC-EDVA, LT. JOSIAH, SGT. JESSUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al
as 1:2012cv01822
Plaintiff:
WILL ANDERSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS RECORD OFFICE PERSONEL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
ANDERSON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00607
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ANDERSON
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR., BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01672
Petitioner:
GRANT ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDERSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv01522
Plaintiff:
WILL ANDERSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00925
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2010cv02044
Petitioner:
DON BENNY ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2010cv01451
Petitioner:
ERIK ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
