Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Kinsey v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv00143
Petitioner:
Rickey H. Kinsey
Respondent:
Randall Anderson, United States Parole Commission and United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ericksen v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00329
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Ericksen
Defendant:
Scott Johnson, Jack Ford, Jon M. Huntsman, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leber v. Anderson et al
as 2:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Leber
Defendant:
Lyle R. Anderson, Craig C. Halls and William L. Schultz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tuttle v. Clark et al
as 2:2008cv00857
Plaintiff:
Wesley A. Tuttle
Defendant:
Lowell Clark, Steven Turley, Richard Garden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wareham v. Anderson
as 2:2008cv00617
Plaintiff:
Gregory Shane Wareham
Defendant:
Lyle Anderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warner v. Patterson et al
as 2:2008cv00519
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr.
Defendant:
Tom Patterson, Scott Carver, Steven Turley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Winder et al
as 2:2007cv00969
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Anderson
Defendant:
James M. Winder and Salt Lake County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Losee v. Garden et al
as 2:2007cv00911
Plaintiff:
Karl Grant Losee
Defendant:
Richard Garden, Sidney Roberts, Kennon Tubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Zuercher
as 2:2007cv00560
Petitioner:
Don Benny Anderson
Respondent:
J.C. Zuercher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gallegos v. Friel et al
as 2:2007cv00367
Plaintiff:
William E. Gallegos
Defendant:
Clint Friel, FNU Turly, Michael Smock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
