Cases 31 - 40 of 2,008
Robert Benney v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1436
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN BENNEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Dale Arnold v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-1423
Plaintiff:
DALE ARNOLD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Montez Bethea v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-1372
Plaintiff:
MONTEZ BETHEA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
LG Street v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1326
Plaintiff:
LG STREET
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Eric Rambert v. Warden Greene SCI, et al
as 24-1313
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
WARDEN GREENE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Frank Tepper v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 24-1271
Plaintiff:
FRANK TEPPER
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Kareem Stansbury v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1255
Plaintiff:
KAREEM J. STANSBURY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Earl Handfield, II v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
EARL C. HANDFIELD, II
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Santos Mota v. Warden Indiana County Jail, et al
as 24-1205
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN INDIANA COUNTY JAIL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
