Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Sharp v. Mims We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00534
Plaintiff: Anthony A. Sharp
Defendant: Margaret Mims and Trinity Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Erie County Vital Statistics
as 6:2010cv06118
Petitioner: Anthony Andre Sharp
Respondent: Erie County Vital Statistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Sharp v. M. Martel, et al
as 09-55536
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY ANDRE SHARP
Respondent - Appellee: M. MARTEL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, M. MONTEL, Warden and others
Anthony Andre Sharp v. Lonie Hansen
as 5:2009cv00178
Plaintiff: Anthony Andre Sharp
Defendant: Lonie Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Anthony Andre Sharp v. M Montel et al
as 5:2008cv01346
Plaintiff: Anthony Andre Sharp
Defendant: M Montel, James Tilton and Schwartneggar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Montel et al
as 3:2008cv01754
Plaintiff: Anthony Andre Sharp
Defendant: M Montel, James Tilton and Schwartneggar
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony Andre Sharp v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01527
Petitioner: Anthony Andre Sharp
Respondent: State of California and M. Mantel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony Sharp v. Joseph Bick We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-16648
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY ANDRE SHARP
Respondent - Appellee: JOSEPH A. BICK
Sharp v. United States Postal Service et al.,
as 2:2008cv01303
Petitioner: Anthony A. Sharp
Respondent: United States Postal Service and Kelli Hammond
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sharp v. United States Postal Service et al.,
as 1:2008cv00841
Petitioner: Anthony A. Sharp
Respondent: United States Postal Service and Kelli Hammond
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?