Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Provencher v. Apple
as 9:2015cv01416
Petitioner:
Sean Provencher
Respondent:
Craig Apple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cannon v. Correctional Medical Care, Inc. et al
as 9:2015cv01417
Cross Defendant:
Katherine Coogan
Plaintiff:
Tracy Cannon
Not Classified By Court:
David R. Homer
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Care, Inc., Emre Umar, Maria Carpio and others
Cross Claimant:
Craig Apple, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinds v. County of Albany et al
as 9:2015cv01325
Plaintiff:
Kendra Hinds
Defendant:
County of Albany, Corrections Officer Joe, Jane Doe Number One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Apple et al
as 9:2015cv01269
Plaintiff:
Gina Carpenter
Defendant:
Craig Apple, Albany County Sheriff's Office, County of Albany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Roberson et al
as 9:2015cv00930
Plaintiff:
Dominique Smith
Defendant:
Augustus Roberson, III, Craig Apple, Sr., Christian Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Apple et al
as 9:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Marcelles Howard
Defendant:
Craig D. Apple, Albany County Correctional Facility, Thomas J. Wigger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeFlore v. County of Albany et al
as 9:2014cv00932
Plaintiff:
Shamir LeFlore
Defendant:
County of Albany, Correctional Medical Care, Inc., Emre Umar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Tibco et al
as 1:2014cv05270
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Tibco, Giga Orn Research, Sqrrl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeter v. Timberlake et al
as 1:2014cv03976
Plaintiff:
Sharon Jeter
Defendant:
Justin Timberlake, Pharrell Williams, Beyonce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fraizer v. Apple et al
as 9:2014cv00451
Plaintiff:
Eric Fraizer
Defendant:
Craig Apple, Albany County, Albany County Mental Health Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
