Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Zammiello v. Mauch et al
as 8:2015cv00773
Plaintiff:
Carmen A. Zammiello
Defendant:
David D. Mauch, Stephaine A. Banks and Mario J. Manetta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Roche et al
as 6:2013cv01978
Plaintiff:
Kerry D. Clark
Defendant:
Renee A. Roche, Marangeli Decos Ferrer, Michael Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reilly v. Herrera et al
as 1:2013cv23077
Plaintiff:
Sean P. Reilly
Defendant:
Guelsy M. Herrera, Eric Abrahamsen, Jennifer Christine Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zammiello v. City of St. Petersburg et al
as 8:2013cv01959
Plaintiff:
Carmen A. Zammiello
Defendant:
City of St. Petersburg, David A. Mauch, Stephanie A. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benito-Carmenate v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01785
Petitioner:
Ariel Benito-Carmenate
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Cox et al
as 1:2012cv22554
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bell
Defendant:
Becky Cox, Carmen Jacobson and Jean Michel Discoubet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Carmen et al
as 2:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Katrina M. Wade
Defendant:
Bill Carmen, Major Rodger, Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arlotta v. Walker et al
as 3:2010cv00970
Plaintiff:
Carmen Arlotta
Defendant:
Sabrina Walker, Craig Carghill, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pisano v. Attorney General, State of Florida
as 8:2010cv01879
Petitioner:
Robert Carmen Pisano, III
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Poveda et al
as 9:2010cv80979
Plaintiff:
Permon Thomas
Defendant:
Julio Poveda, Dena Tate, William Churchwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
