Cases 31 - 40 of 325
Campbell v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv21906
Plaintiff:
Harrington Campbell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Logan v. Martin County et al
as 2:2023cv14119
Plaintiff:
Campbell Logan
Defendant:
Martin County, 19th Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Circuit Judge William L. Roby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. CAMPBELL et al
as 5:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
KAYLA CAMPBELL and FOREMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv60455
Plaintiff:
Gerald Campbell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Underwood v. Campbell et al
as 9:2023cv80245
Plaintiff:
William Floyd Underwood
Defendant:
Glenn Campbell and Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Campbell et al
as 3:2022cv01420
Plaintiff:
Edmond Allen Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Erron Campbell, Dr. E. Perez-Lugo, Corizon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. CAMPBELL et al
as 5:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
KAYLA CAMPBELL and FOREMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
Donnell Campbell
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Austin v. C.O. Campbell et al
as 3:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Phillip L. Austin, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. Campbell, Sgt. Ewing, Sgt. Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boobyyaa v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Mandingo Boobyyaa and Keith Mason
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, T. Campbell, Major Dedge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
