Cases 31 - 40 of 105
Green v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2017cv04786
Plaintiff:
Michelle A. Green
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Cook County Dept Of Corrections
as 1:2017cv04790
Plaintiff:
Ghemilia F. Butler
Defendant:
Cook County Dept Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banys v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv04535
Plaintiff:
Melissa S. Banys
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corrections and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv01984
Plaintiff:
Belton Reed
Defendant:
Tom J. Dart, Cook County Dept. of Corrections and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weatherspoon v. Cook County Dept Of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv10926
Plaintiff:
Alexander Weatherspoon
Defendant:
Cook County Dept Of Corrections and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv05522
Plaintiff:
Kris Sanchez
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corrections and CPD (Chicago Police Department)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Cook County Dept Of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv08460
Plaintiff:
Allan Lawrence Gardner
Defendant:
Cook County Dept Of Corrections, County of Cook and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv07355
Plaintiff:
Michael D Lewis
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corrections and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolfes v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv05675
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Rolfes
Defendant:
John Doe, Cook County Dept. of Corrections, Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Furlano v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv05376
Plaintiff:
Michael Furlano
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County Dept. of Corrections and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
