Cases 31 - 40 of 46
White v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00543
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael P Randle, Roger E Walker, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00346
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White, Faygie Fields, Terrence M Love and others
Defendant:
Yolande D Johnson, Gregory Lambert, Robin Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. IDOC
as 3:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker Jr, Michael P Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. IDOC
as 1:2011cv01063
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker Jr, Michael P Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mejia v. Gobble et al
as 1:2010cv07712
Plaintiff:
Michael Mejia
Defendant:
Chuck Gobble, c/o Tasalis, c/o Quarles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainge v. Walker et al
as 1:2010cv02503
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rainge
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Peirson, Buchner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 1:2009cv06629
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, J. T. Sharles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. Walter et al
as 3:2009cv03266
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
David Walter, Yolande D Johnson, Charles W Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Cook County et al
as 1:2009cv04706
Plaintiff:
Kolawole J Smith, Jamil Goodall and Gabriel D Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Burnell et al
as 3:2009cv50037
Plaintiff:
Willem Wallace
Defendant:
Burnell, Gruhaving, Ken Williams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
