Cases 31 - 40 of 2,157
Oseguera v. Corpus
as 3:2024cv02000
Petitioner:
Daniel Oseguera
Respondent:
Christina Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Dorsey v. Youngblood et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dorsey
Defendant:
Donny Youngblood, Kern County Sheriff's Office, John Weigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Paramo et al
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Marcus Pollard, M. Hagemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Glandros Danielle June, Jr. v. Rogelio Nunez et al
as 2:2024cv02658
Plaintiff:
Glandros Danielle June, Jr.
Defendant:
Rogelio Nunez, Stephanie Avila, Kimberly Jung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Rowe v. A. Bender
as 2:2024cv02282
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rowe
Defendant:
A. Bender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manago v. Cueva et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E. Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Wayne Grogan v. People of The State of California
as 2:2024cv02158
Petitioner:
Daniel Grogan
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chalker v. Painter
as 1:2024cv01366
Petitioner:
Justin S. Chalker
Respondent:
Daniel K. Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
DePonte v. Bowman et al
as 3:2024cv01414
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Allison
as 5:2024cv01333
Petitioner:
Daniel Jimenez
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
