Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Harris, Sr. et al v. Buckhorn et al
as 8:2012cv02566
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Harris, Sr. and Marcus B. Harris
Defendant:
Bob Buckhorn, City of Tampa, Timothy Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KERRY DOYLE and KATS-KAGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2012cv00168
Petitioner:
Mark Doyle
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COX v. GOSS et al
as 3:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
DERRICK COX, SR
Defendant:
ERIK GOSS, JOHN DOYLE and SHAWN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Granda v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2010cv00551
Plaintiff:
Paulino Granda
Defendant:
Scott Middlebrooks, Michael Pineiro, Jeffrey Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. United States
as 3:2010cv00395
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Patterson v. Beary et al
as 6:2010cv00508
Defendant:
Kevin Beary, Jeremy Johnson, Shawn Halleran and others
Plaintiff:
Keal Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2008cv01698
Petitioner:
Doyle Lakeith Gray
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKenna v. Doyle et al
as 8:2008cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey McKenna
Defendant:
Anne Doyle, Mrs. Casp and FNU Crist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2008cv00254
Petitioner:
Doyle G. Galin
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
