Cases 31 - 40 of 269
Aguirre v. Sherriff Ed Gonzales et al
as 4:2023cv03440
Plaintiff:
David Aguirre
Defendant:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, Nurse Practitioner Ewurmle, Nurse Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Ed Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03718
Petitioner:
Delarick Evans
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Supervisor Over the Medical Department et al
as 4:2023cv04058
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Supervisor Over the Medical Department, Supervisor Over the Dietary Department and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03547
Petitioner:
J.B. Black
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv03268
Plaintiff:
Louis Hernandez
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, HCSO Medical Department and HCSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annis v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03349
Petitioner:
Rocky Annis
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03580
Petitioner:
Cameron Jonarin Barnes and Cameron Jon Barnes
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03334
Plaintiff:
Delarick Evans
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Slayton v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03114
Petitioner:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nations v. Ed Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03769
Petitioner:
Mark Nations
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
