Cases 31 - 40 of 275
Aniyunwiya v. Lutz et al
as 2:2022cv02325
Plaintiff:
Achak Ben Aniyunwiya
Defendant:
Matthew Lutz, Brice Swiney, Mark C Fleegle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon v. USA
as 4:2022cv00666
Petitioner:
Edward Brandon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Weatherspoon v. Warden, Federal Correctional Insitute Elkton
as 4:2022cv00479
Petitioner:
Edward Weatherspoon
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Correctional Insitute Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Curtis v. Garza et al
as 4:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Courtney Curtis
Defendant:
Warden F. Garza, Assistant Warden Burnside, Michael Caraval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Skaggs
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Edward Thompson
Defendant:
James Skaggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hill
as 1:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
Edward A. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Leon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morrow v. Fleegle et al
as 2:2021cv05193
Plaintiff:
Michael Ledante Morrow
Defendant:
Mark C Fleegle, John Liddle, Tamas Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batton v. Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv01771
Plaintiff:
SARA BATTON
Defendant:
SANDUSKY COUNTY OHIO, SANDUSKY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SANDUSKY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 1:2021cv00537
Petitioner:
Phillip Marcellus Edwards
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray and Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2021cv04217
Petitioner:
Phillip Marcellus Edwards
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
