Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Hamer v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2018cv01087
Plaintiff:
Damein Hamer
Defendant:
Henderson County, Henderson County Justice Center, Jackie FNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruse v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Cruse
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail and Jackie Bausman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Moreno et al
as 3:2017cv01327
Plaintiff:
Dejuana Henderson
Defendant:
Herman Moreno and Tony Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn v. Henderson County Criminal Justice Complex
as 1:2016cv01114
Petitioner:
James J. Wynn
Respondent:
Henderson County Criminal Justice Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tigner v. Memphis Police Department of Shelby County, TN et al
as 2:2016cv02287
Plaintiff:
Charles Henderson Tigner, IV
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department of Shelby County, TN, Connor Shielling, Gloria Winfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv02608
Movant:
Decarlos Henderson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01115
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baltimore et al v. Bond et al
as 1:2015cv01066
Plaintiff:
Cordarious Baltimore, Kenneth Eric McFarland, Ray Collier and others
Defendant:
Melvin Bond, Tonya Fisher, Cedrick Tyus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2014cv02916
Plaintiff:
James Henderson
Defendant:
Charles Mitchell, Amy Weirich and Carolyn Blackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
