Cases 31 - 40 of 331
Abdo v. Oklahoma City Parole Office et al
as 5:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
John Abdo, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Parole Office and J Pleasant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Bridges et al
as 4:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Barnett and Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Carrie Bridges, Capt. Charles Phillips, Tracie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barlean v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Kelly J Barlean
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Jesse Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Bridges
as 5:2023cv00531
Petitioner:
Tony J Wilson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Graham v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Trustees et al
as 5:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Trustees, Oklahoma County Sheriff, Corporal FNU McKinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson v. Harpe
as 5:2023cv00299
Petitioner:
Philip J Hudson
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Pacer
as 5:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
J Pacer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
