Cases 31 - 40 of 50
WOMACK v. CHILES et al
as 1:2009cv02263
Plaintiff:
JOE NATHAN WOMACK
Defendant:
JOYCE CHILES and K. ELIZABETH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOUIS v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv01952
Petitioner:
LUCNER ST. LOUIS
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, HARLEY LAPPIN, JOE NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARKS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01516
Petitioner:
DARRELL J. PARKS
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, K. M. WHITE, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. REILLY et al
as 1:2009cv01270
Plaintiff:
DARRELL J. PARKS
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00427
Petitioner:
WILL ANDERSON
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN and JOHN JOE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HYLAND v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOHN VINCENT HYLAND, JR.
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, JOE BIDEN, JOHN MCCAIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
COOPER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
HARDIN IZELL COOPER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOE KEFFER, ANTHONY GARO and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WHEELER v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv01873
Plaintiff:
QUINTON WHEELER
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, JOE DRIVER, JEFF BOYLES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CALVILLO-JIMENEZ v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv01730
Petitioner:
OSCAR CALVILLO-JIMENEZ
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, MICHAEL MUKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HAZEL v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv01644
Plaintiff:
BOBBY E. HAZEL
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, JOE DRIVER, JEFF BOYLES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
