Cases 31 - 40 of 1,161
Jones v. Micah et al
as 3:2023cv50399
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Defendant:
Micah, Ginn and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Foster et al
as 1:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Edgar Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Levi Foster, Tod Punke, . Gate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Henderson et al
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jackson
Defendant:
. Henderson, John Marter, Nicholas C Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 3:2023cv03354
Petitioner:
Qwanell S Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. Nodine et al
as 1:2023cv16725
Plaintiff:
DeLaurence Robinson
Defendant:
Lt. S Nodine, Lt. Sykes, Lt. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garnett v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Barron Garnett
Defendant:
Michael Downey, Kankakee County, Jerome Combs Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv15320
Plaintiff:
Rodney Miller, Eric Miller, Edwin G. Enger and others
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Don Beachem and Ms. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50371
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Robinson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Deputy Chief, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Jones
as 3:2023cv03748
Plaintiff:
Germarco Tate
Defendant:
Nick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hansen et al
as 1:2023cv01393
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen, Nurse Kim, Nurse Jerry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
