Cases 31 - 40 of 1,128
Herrera v. Mahoney et al
as 3:2023cv50360
Plaintiff:
Edgar Herrera
Defendant:
Timothy K. Mahoney and Steven Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gater v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv14475
Plaintiff:
Artavia Gater
Defendant:
Sherwin K Miles, Donald A Terry, Craig A Carlook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv03063
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Haynes et al
as 3:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
Terrell Taylor
Defendant:
A Haynes, J Davis, K. Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shehadeh v. Harris et al
as 3:2023cv03267
Plaintiff:
Jamal Shehadeh
Defendant:
Gregory K Harris and Sarah E. Seberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Dawson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50309
Plaintiff:
Alex J. Dawson
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Tarry Williams, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ford et al
as 4:2023cv04133
Plaintiff:
Jamal Taylor
Defendant:
. Ford, K Johnson and . Mattingly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westbrooks v. Will County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 1:2023cv05466
Plaintiff:
Jemuel M. Westbrooks
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Facility, K. Brasky, D. Santerelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huggins v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv05150
Plaintiff:
DeRayShaun Huggins
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, Rocco Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. F.B.O.P. M.C.C. Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv05002
Plaintiff:
Simeon K. Harris
Defendant:
F.B.O.P. M.C.C. Chicago and Ms. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
