Cases 31 - 40 of 154
ROBINSON v. TUCKER et al
as 4:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, BECKY LAWSON, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Tucker
as 3:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Anthony Richard Baker
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOKS v. TUCKER
as 4:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
WINDSOR E COOKS
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. CREWS
as 4:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
AMON DEAN RICHARDS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CREWS, KENNETH TUCKER, G WELLHAUSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANSON v. TUCKER
as 4:2013cv00016
Petitioner:
CLIFF O HANSON
Respondent:
KENNETH TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROSS v. TUCKER
as 4:2013cv00013
Petitioner:
JAMES M CROSS
Respondent:
KENNETH TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jonathan Lewis v. Kenneth Tucker, et al
as 13-10057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH TUCKER, official capacity jointly, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH-BUREAU CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL AUTHORITY, official capacity jointly, AMADOR NAZARENO and others
WILLIAMS v. TUCKER, et al
as 5:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
QUINCY ALEXANDEXER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, CULPEPER, RICKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOBYYAA v. TUCKER, et al
as 5:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
MANDINGO BOOBYYAA
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, RICKY CLOUD, HEATH HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckner Alcime v. Florida Department of Correcti
as 12-16421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUCKNER ALCIME
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Kenneth Tucker, Secretary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
