Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Bourn v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01384
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Bourn
Defendant:
Judy Gilmore, Jason Bell, William King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Nooth et al
as 2:2018cv01244
Defendant:
Thomas Jost, John Doe, Mark Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Ernie Junior Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byam v. Cain et al
as 2:2018cv01030
Defendant:
C/O Barba, B. Cain, Capps and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jonathan Byam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudolph v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00607
Defendant:
John Aly, Jason Bell, Brad Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Hamzai Tarik Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00284
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Judy Gilmore, John King and others
Plaintiff:
Harley Dillon Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00112
Defendant:
"John Doe", "John Doe", "John" Ally and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Vincent Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh et al v. Gower et al
as 2:2018cv00098
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Brad Cain, "John" Gaffney and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Vincent Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aplin v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01222
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin
Defendant:
Corporal Brooks, Officer Golem, Officer Joe Golem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv00178
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Matthew Barba, Jason Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hailey v. King et al
as 6:2016cv01384
Defendant:
Keeble Giscombe, Jessica D. King, Collette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lyle Hailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
