Cases 31 - 40 of 801
Goodge (PS) v. Calhoun et al
as 1:2023cv02500
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane H.W. Goodge
Defendant:
Calhoun and Joseph Roybal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodge (PS) v. Calhoun
as 1:2023cv02465
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane H.W. Goodge
Defendant:
Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Michael Lopez
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Larry Cox, John Palomino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv02426
Petitioner:
Kenneth Michael Thomas
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson (PS) v. Leithead et al
as 1:2023cv02360
Plaintiff:
Madison Wilson
Defendant:
Lacy Leithead, Michael Yowell, Dale Rostron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweeney (PS) v. Wallace et al
as 1:2023cv02346
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Sweeney
Defendant:
Brendan L. Wallace, Isaac C. Raidl and Christian Lanitello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweeney (PS) v. Edge DTC
as 1:2023cv02342
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Sweeney
Defendant:
Edge DTC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweeney (PS) v. Denver Police
as 1:2023cv02331
Plaintiff:
Michael Sweeney and Michael R. Sweeney
Defendant:
Denver Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweeney (PS) v. Adams County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2023cv02332
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Sweeney
Defendant:
Adams County Detention Facility, E. Torkilson, J. Spillis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. Tatoya et al
as 1:2023cv02314
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
Mo Tatoya, Michael Dugo, Punjwanj and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
